← All varieties

Beauty Of Kent

Apple

Origin & History

The origin of this handsome English apple is not known. It is first noticed by Forsyth in his Treatise on Fruit Trees, but according to the Herefordshire Pomona (1885) it was not mentioned in any of the nurserymen's catalogues, either of the last or the early part of the present century. It was introduced to the Brompton Park Nursery about the year 1820 and became very widely cultivated throughout England. It is probably the Rambour Franc of the French pomologists. A very good representation of it is given in Ronalds' Pyrus Malus Brentfordiensis, plate xv, fig. 1. In England it is said to do best under garden culture in warm soil and on Paradise stock; grown in clay and other uncongenial soils it loses quality (Beach, 1905). It was but little known in New York as of 1905.

Tree

The tree is large, strong, and vigorous, with an upright growth habit. Shoots are dark (Thomas, 1903). It is better adapted as a standard than as an espalier or pyramid, and attains a large size, forming a very handsome tree (Herefordshire Pomona). It comes into bearing rather young, is a reliable cropper, and is moderately productive — described as "rather productive" by Warder (1867) and "moderately productive" by both Downing and Beach. It bears freely (Herefordshire Pomona). It has a tendency to canker if not in congenial soil (Herefordshire Pomona).

Fruit

Size: Large to very large. When well grown it is perhaps the most magnificent apple in cultivation (Herefordshire Pomona). Thomas (1903) calls it "one of the most beautiful and magnificent in appearance of all apples." Downing is quoted as saying that in America "the fruit in this climate is one of the most magnificent of all apples, frequently measuring sixteen or eighteen inches in circumference."

Form: Roundish, flattened at the base and narrowing toward the eye, somewhat conical. Warder (1867) describes it as roundish, flattened, somewhat conic, regular. The Herefordshire Pomona describes it as roundish ovate, broad and flattened at the base and narrowing towards the apex, where it is terminated by several prominent angles. Downing says roundish but flat at the base and narrowing distinctly to the eye, where it is slightly ribbed, smooth. Thomas (1903) describes it as rounding, somewhat flattish-conical, fair, smooth, and rather obtuse.

Stem: Short and slender. Warder gives the length as medium to short. Thomas (1903) gives the length as three-fourths to an inch and a half long, slender. Downing describes it as short, slender, deeply planted.

Cavity: Sources vary in detail. Warder (1867): medium, acute, wavy, green. Herefordshire Pomona: wide and deep, with the base entirely covered with rough brown russet. Downing: round, russeted, corrugated. Thomas (1903): acuminate.

Calyx/Eye: Small and closed. Warder: eye very small, closed. Herefordshire Pomona: small and closed, with short segments. Downing and Thomas both describe the calyx as small.

Basin: Sources disagree on depth. Warder (1867): quite shallow, regular. Herefordshire Pomona: narrow and angular. Downing: narrow. Thomas (1903): deep, narrow.

Skin: Greenish-yellow ground color, more or less covered with red. Warder (1867): greenish yellow, more or less covered with bright red mixed, and splashed with a darker hue; dots small. The Herefordshire Pomona describes it as deep yellow, slightly tinged with green, and marked with faint patches of red on the shaded side, but entirely covered with deep red except where there are a few patches of deep yellow on the side next the sun. Downing: greenish-yellow, marked with large, broken stripes of purplish red. Thomas (1903): nearly the whole surface striped with rich purplish red. Elliott (1865): greenish yellow, striped with purpled red.

Flesh & Flavor: Yellowish to whitish-yellow, tender, juicy. Warder (1867): whitish yellow, breaking, juicy; flavor acid; quality only good. The Herefordshire Pomona: yellowish, tender, and juicy, with a pleasant subacid flavour. Downing: juicy, crisp, tender, with a simple subacid flavor; rated Good. Thomas (1903): tender, slightly sub-acid, of rather poor flavor. Elliott (1865) describes it simply as tender, inferior.

Core & Seeds: Warder (1867): core regular, medium, ovate, slightly open, clasping the eye; seeds angular, imperfect. No other source describes the core or seeds.

Season

September or late September through November in America. Warder (1867) gives September and October. Downing gives October and November. Beach (1905) gives late September to November. Elliott (1865) gives October, November. Thomas (1903) says late autumn. The Herefordshire Pomona extends the season considerably in England, giving October to February, calling it one of the most popular winter apples for culinary purposes.

Uses

A culinary apple, well suited for cooking and market. Warder (1867) notes it is "well adapted by its size and appearance" for cooking and market use. The Herefordshire Pomona calls it "a valuable and well-known culinary apple" and "one of the most desirable and useful either for a small garden or for more extended cultivation." Thomas (1903) states it is "of little or no value, except for cooking."

Subtypes & Variants

Not described in source.

Other

Beach (1905) provides an extensive reference list of 27 citations spanning from Forsyth (1803) through Garden magazine (1903), documenting the variety's long history in pomological literature on both sides of the Atlantic.

Book Sources

Described in 6 period pomological works

Nursery Catalog Sources

Found in 8 catalogs (1845–1917) from England, Massachusetts

View original book sources (6)

Beauty of Kent.

A large English apple, well adapted to the kitchen.

Tree upright, vigorous, rather productive.

Fruit large to very large, roundish, flattened, somewhat conic, regular; Surface greenish yellow, more or less covered with bright red mixed, and splashed with a darker hue; Dots small.

Basin quite shallow, regular; Eye very small, closed.

Cavity medium, acute, wavy, green; Stem medium to short.

Core regular, medium, ovate, slightly open, clasping the eye; Seeds angular, imperfect; Flesh whitish yellow, breaking, juicy; Flavor acid; Quality only good; Use, cooking and market, for which it is well adapted by its size and appearance; Season, September and October.

— John A. Warder, American Pomology: Apples (1867)

BEAUTY OF KENT.

The origin of this handsome apple is not known. It is first noticed by Forsyth in his Treatise on Fruit Trees, but it is not mentioned in any of the nurserymen's catalogues, either of the last or the early part of the present century. It was introduced to the Brompton Park Nursery about the year 1820, and is now very widely cultivated throughout the country. It is probably the Rambour Franc of the French pomologists. A very good representation of it is given in Ronalds' Pyrus Malus Brentfordiensis, plate xv, fig. 1.

Description.—Fruit, large, roundish ovate, broad and flattened at the base, and narrowing towards the apex, where it is terminated by several prominent angles. Skin, deep yellow, slightly tinged with green, and marked with faint patches of red on the shaded side, but entirely covered with deep red, except when there are a few patches of deep yellow on the side next the sun. Eye, small and closed, with short segments, and set in a narrow and angular basin. Stalk, short, inserted in a wide and deep cavity, which, with the base, is entirely covered with rough brown russet. Flesh, yellowish, tender, and juicy, with a pleasant subacid flavour.

A valuable and well-known culinary apple, in season from October to February. When well grown it is perhaps the most magnificent apple in cultivation. Downing says of it in America, "The fruit in this climate is one of the most magnificent of all apples, frequently measuring sixteen or eighteen inches in circumference."

The tree is a strong and vigorous grower. It is better adapted as a standard, than as an espalier or pyramid. It attains a large size, forms a very handsome tree, and bears freely. It is one of the most popular winter apples for culinary purposes, and one of the most desirable and useful either for a small garden or for more extended cultivation. It has a tendency to canker if not in congenial soil.

Woolhope Naturalists Field Club, The Herefordshire Pomona (1885)

Beauty of Kent.

A showy English sort for culinary uses. The tree grows very strong and upright, moderately productive.

Fruit very large, roundish, but flat at the base, and narrowing distinctly to the eye, where it is slightly ribbed, smooth, greenish-yellow, marked with large, broken stripes of purplish red. Stalk short, slender, deeply planted in a round, russeted, corrugated cavity. Calyx small, set in a narrow basin. Flesh juicy, crisp, tender, with a simple subacid flavor. Good. October and November.

A.J. Downing, The Fruits and Fruit Trees of America (1900)

BEAUTY OF KENT.

REFERENCES. 1. Forsyth, 1803:55. 2. Ib., 1824:93. 3. London Hort. Soc. Cat., 1831:No. 59. 4. Kenrick, 1832:92. 5. Floy-Lindley, 1833:20. 6. Downing, 1845:81. 7. Hovey, Mag. Hort., 14:250. 1848. fig. 8. Kirtland, Horticulturist, 2:544. 1848. 9. Thomas, 1849:146. 10. Cole, 1849:114. 11. Emmons, Nat. Hist. N. Y., 3:34. 1851. 12. Barry, 1851:283. 13. Elliott, 1854:167. 14. Hooper, 1857:15. 15. Gregg, 1857:41. 16. Downing, Horticulturist, 19:364. 1864. figs. 17. Warder, 1867:584. 18. Fitz, 1872:152. 19. Leroy, 1873:97. fig. 20. Hogg, 1884:17. 21. Lyon, Mich. Hort. Soc. Rpt., 1890:288. 22. Wickson, 1889:245. 23. Bailey, An. Hort., 1892:234. 24. Bunyard, Jour. Roy. Hort. Soc., 1898:354. 25. Budd-Hansen, 1903:109. 26. Powell and Fulton, U. S. B. P. I. Bul. 48:46. 1903. 27. Garden, 64:239. 1903. fig. bearing nursery trees.

SYNONYMS. BEAUTE DE KENT (19). BEAUTY OF KENT (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27). Beauty of Kent (19, 26). KENT BEAUTY (25, 26). Kentish Pippin (19, of some 3). Pepin de Kent (19). Pippin Kent (19).

Fruit large, beautiful, showy, suitable for culinary use, in season from late September to November. The tree is large, vigorous, upright, comes into bearing rather young, is a reliable cropper and moderately productive. In England where it originated it is said to do best under garden culture in warm soil and on Paradise stock; grown in clay and other uncongenial soils it loses quality (27). It is but little known in New York.

S.A. Beach, The Apples of New York, Vol. 2 (1905)

Beauty of Kent. Foreign. Large, roundish, greenish yellow, striped with purpled red ; flesh, tender, inferior. October, November.

— F.R. Elliott, The Western Fruit Book (1865)

Beauty of Kent. Very large, rounding, somewhat flattish-conical, fair, smooth, and rather obtuse; nearly the whole surface striped with rich purplish red; stalk three-fourths to an inch and a half long, slender; cavity acuminate; calyx small, basin deep, narrow; flesh tender, slightly sub-acid, of rather poor flavor. One of the most beautiful and magnificent in appearance of all apples, but of little or no value, except for cooking. Late autumn. Growth strong and upright, shoots dark. English.

— John J. Thomas, The American Fruit Culturist (1903)
Beaute De Kent Gadd's Seedling Gadd’s Seedling Kent Beauty Kentish Beauty Kentish Pippin Pepin de Kent Peppin Kent Pippin Kent Rambour Franc Schöner aus Kent Col. Vaughan Kentish Pippin Kent Kent Beauty Summer Rambo Summer Rambour No. 8. Rambour D'Ete