← All varieties

Jongrimes

Apple

Jongrimes

Origin / History

Originated in Indiana by R. S. Rogers. Commercially introduced about 1948. Parentage unknown. The variety does not resemble either Jonathan or Grimes Golden. It has not been planted often in Oregon, and it is doubtful it will ever become a popular variety.

Tree

Not described in source.

Fruit

Size: Large, 2½ to 3¼ inches.

Form: Round to oblate-ovate.

Stem: Not described in source.

Cavity: Deep.

Calyx: Not described in source.

Basin: Not described in source.

Skin: Medium thick, tough, and attractive. Ground color yellow, faintly striped and splashed with red, and appealing. Coloring is poor.

Dots: Not described in source.

Flesh and flavor: White, firm, fine, crisp, and juicy. Medium subacid to tart. Flavor fair.

Core and seeds: Not described in source.

Season

Harvested about 2 weeks before Jonathan. Keeps as well in storage. Fruits tend to set in heavy clusters and need thinning. Fruits do not hang well on the tree when ripe.

Uses

Market and shipping reputation is limited. Limitations are its poor coloring, tart flavor, clustering habit of bearing, and lack of good storage quality.

Subtypes / Variants

Not described in source.

Other

Plant Patent No. 794.

Book Sources

Described in 1 period pomological work

View original book sources (1)

Jongrimes Plant Pat. No. 794

This variety, originated in Indiana by R. S. Rogers, was commercially introduced about 1948. The parentage is unknown. The variety does not resemble either Jonathan or Grimes Golden. Fruit is large—2½ to 3¼ inches——round to oblate-ovate, with a deep cavity. Skin color is yellow, faintly striped and splashed with red, and appealing. Skin is medium thick, tough, and attractive. The flesh is medium subacid to tart, firm, fine, white, crisp, juicy, and fair flavored. The fruits tend to set in heavy clusters and need thinning. This variety is harvested about 2 weeks before Jonathan and keeps as well in storage. Fruits do not hang well on the tree when ripe. This variety has not been planted often in Oregon, and it is doubtful if it will ever become a popular variety. Several limitations are its poor coloring, tart flavor, clustering habit of bearing, and lack of good storage quality.

— Quentin B. Zielinski, Apple Varieties for Oregon (1964)